<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greylisting and GMAIL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/greylisting-and-gmail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/greylisting-and-gmail/</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of www.tradebooster.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:09:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gadzet</title>
		<link>http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/greylisting-and-gmail/comment-page-1/#comment-1108</link>
		<dc:creator>gadzet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 01:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/?p=11#comment-1108</guid>
		<description>My spouse and i got  joyous when Ervin could complete his preliminary research from your ideas he acquired through your blog. It is now and again perplexing just to continually be freely giving methods which usually some people have been trying to sell. And we all take into account we now have you to give thanks to because of that. Most of the explanations you have made, the simple website menu, the friendships you will aid to engender - it is many spectacular, and it&#039;s really aiding our son and the family reckon that the theme is fun, which is seriously indispensable. Many thanks for all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My spouse and i got  joyous when Ervin could complete his preliminary research from your ideas he acquired through your blog. It is now and again perplexing just to continually be freely giving methods which usually some people have been trying to sell. And we all take into account we now have you to give thanks to because of that. Most of the explanations you have made, the simple website menu, the friendships you will aid to engender &#8211; it is many spectacular, and it&#8217;s really aiding our son and the family reckon that the theme is fun, which is seriously indispensable. Many thanks for all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @amartinezi</title>
		<link>http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/greylisting-and-gmail/comment-page-1/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>@amartinezi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/?p=11#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>I have same issue..long delay due to several smtp conectionc with diferent ip </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have same issue..long delay due to several smtp conectionc with diferent ip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheap lebron shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/greylisting-and-gmail/comment-page-1/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheap lebron shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/?p=11#comment-985</guid>
		<description>This is a good article, that&#039;s what I&#039;m looking for, thank you for sharing, expect you to constantly update! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good article, that&#039;s what I&#039;m looking for, thank you for sharing, expect you to constantly update!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Winkless</title>
		<link>http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/greylisting-and-gmail/comment-page-1/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Winkless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/?p=11#comment-604</guid>
		<description>The correct solution is to modify the greylisting so that SMTP servers from the same root domain are treated as equivalent for the greylisting rules. Any other modification is just a nasty hack. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The correct solution is to modify the greylisting so that SMTP servers from the same root domain are treated as equivalent for the greylisting rules. Any other modification is just a nasty hack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerminalDigit</title>
		<link>http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/greylisting-and-gmail/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>TerminalDigit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/?p=11#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t used Postgrey myself, but it doesn&#039;t look like stripping the last byte would work here (Google has way more than 256 IPs).  In the example given, the first IP is 66.249.82.232, so Postgrey should permit follow-ups from 66.249.82.xxx.  But Google retries from 64.233.178.250, 209.85.200.174, 64.233.170.187, and finally 209.85.200.171.  Even if the last byte were dropped from consideration, there still wouldn&#039;t be a match until the last communication.  Again, I haven&#039;t used postgrey, so do let me know if I&#039;m misinterpreting this.

Also interesting to note that the same hostname &quot;wf-out-1314.google.com&quot; appears to be mapping to both 209.85.200.171 and 209.85.200.174.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t used Postgrey myself, but it doesn&#8217;t look like stripping the last byte would work here (Google has way more than 256 IPs).  In the example given, the first IP is 66.249.82.232, so Postgrey should permit follow-ups from 66.249.82.xxx.  But Google retries from 64.233.178.250, 209.85.200.174, 64.233.170.187, and finally 209.85.200.171.  Even if the last byte were dropped from consideration, there still wouldn&#8217;t be a match until the last communication.  Again, I haven&#8217;t used postgrey, so do let me know if I&#8217;m misinterpreting this.</p>
<p>Also interesting to note that the same hostname &#8220;wf-out-1314.google.com&#8221; appears to be mapping to both 209.85.200.171 and 209.85.200.174.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Krengel</title>
		<link>http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/greylisting-and-gmail/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Krengel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/?p=11#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Looks like you are just missing a feature on your greylisting solution.

Postgrey according to thier description shouldn&#039;t have this issue.
&quot;Lookup by subnet
    Addresses are normally stripped of their last byte, so that mail servers with multiple addresses are recognized as only one.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like you are just missing a feature on your greylisting solution.</p>
<p>Postgrey according to thier description shouldn&#8217;t have this issue.<br />
&#8220;Lookup by subnet<br />
    Addresses are normally stripped of their last byte, so that mail servers with multiple addresses are recognized as only one.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

