<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tradebooster Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tradebooster.com/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Greylisting and GMAIL by TerminalDigit</title>
		<link>http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/greylisting-and-gmail/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>TerminalDigit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/?p=11#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Haven't used Postgrey myself, but it doesn't look like stripping the last byte would work here (Google has way more than 256 IPs).  In the example given, the first IP is 66.249.82.232, so Postgrey should permit follow-ups from 66.249.82.xxx.  But Google retries from 64.233.178.250, 209.85.200.174, 64.233.170.187, and finally 209.85.200.171.  Even if the last byte were dropped from consideration, there still wouldn't be a match until the last communication.  Again, I haven't used postgrey, so do let me know if I'm misinterpreting this.

Also interesting to note that the same hostname "wf-out-1314.google.com" appears to be mapping to both 209.85.200.171 and 209.85.200.174.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t used Postgrey myself, but it doesn&#8217;t look like stripping the last byte would work here (Google has way more than 256 IPs).  In the example given, the first IP is 66.249.82.232, so Postgrey should permit follow-ups from 66.249.82.xxx.  But Google retries from 64.233.178.250, 209.85.200.174, 64.233.170.187, and finally 209.85.200.171.  Even if the last byte were dropped from consideration, there still wouldn&#8217;t be a match until the last communication.  Again, I haven&#8217;t used postgrey, so do let me know if I&#8217;m misinterpreting this.</p>
<p>Also interesting to note that the same hostname &#8220;wf-out-1314.google.com&#8221; appears to be mapping to both 209.85.200.171 and 209.85.200.174.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Domain Expiry and Renewal Process explained by Dereck</title>
		<link>http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/domain-expiry-and-renewal-process-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Dereck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/?p=6#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Nice tips for beginners</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice tips for beginners</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My domain expired and somebody else registered it by tjens</title>
		<link>http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/my-domain-expired-and-somebody-else-registered-it/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>tjens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/?p=8#comment-11</guid>
		<description>thx for the tip ill keep it in mind :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thx for the tip ill keep it in mind <img src='http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Greylisting and GMAIL by Jonathan Krengel</title>
		<link>http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/greylisting-and-gmail/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Krengel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/?p=11#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Looks like you are just missing a feature on your greylisting solution.

Postgrey according to thier description shouldn't have this issue.
"Lookup by subnet
    Addresses are normally stripped of their last byte, so that mail servers with multiple addresses are recognized as only one."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like you are just missing a feature on your greylisting solution.</p>
<p>Postgrey according to thier description shouldn&#8217;t have this issue.<br />
&#8220;Lookup by subnet<br />
    Addresses are normally stripped of their last byte, so that mail servers with multiple addresses are recognized as only one.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Domain Expiry and Renewal Process explained by AlexM</title>
		<link>http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/domain-expiry-and-renewal-process-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 03:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/?p=6#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Your blog is interesting! 
 
Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your blog is interesting! </p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Cheap Domain Name Registering Companies really worth it? by Mk</title>
		<link>http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/are-cheap-domain-name-registering-companies-really-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Mk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 15:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradebooster.com/blog/?p=7#comment-2</guid>
		<description>This is essentially the way the domain industry is being run:

Godaddy says this is the price and everyone has to comply.  Never mind that it takes about a week to get a good godaddy response or that godaddy is too big for it's own good.  It can charge up to 15$ per domain with no problems because people are ignorant.

I've bought a few domains from TB and I'm very happy with the solutions they provide.   Mainly, the service!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is essentially the way the domain industry is being run:</p>
<p>Godaddy says this is the price and everyone has to comply.  Never mind that it takes about a week to get a good godaddy response or that godaddy is too big for it&#8217;s own good.  It can charge up to 15$ per domain with no problems because people are ignorant.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve bought a few domains from TB and I&#8217;m very happy with the solutions they provide.   Mainly, the service!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
